Recently, the Senate Economics Legislation Committee in Australia refused to grant their endorsement for the “Digital Assets (Market Regulation) Bill 2023” that had been submitted by Senator Andrew Bragg. This bill sought to introduce a structure for the supervision of digital assets and develop conformity and custody conditions for crypto / cryptocurrency suppliers around the country. The committee conveyed it couldn’t pronounce on the coercion because of paucity of specifics, alongside potential frictions with the governing body’s present strategy.
The move from the Australian government to reject Bragg’s bill simply serves to evidence their vigilant stance towards coming up with policies on virtual assets interestingly, just like governments in the global landscape. Australia is on a mission to stray a line between directives and enhancement concerning the swiftlycong progress of the virtual asset domain. It doesn’t stand for putting a blanket ban but it symbolizes their thoroughness to reject it as it stands. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has so far commended a complementary query associated with cryptocurrency policies. Even though known to applaud Bitcoin, Australia remains stuck in the rut to conclude upon a reflected legal scheme as cryptocurrencies make noticeable headway into energetic incorporation. Most in demand of any regulatory move while, fighting helpless uncertainties, remains the crypto industry. They are both keen and interested to witness mull statutory fors of the authorities.