Jacob Bankman-Fried’s legal team presented their position to the 2nd Circuit in the US, denying an allegation of freedom of speech violation after sharing penned works of his ex-colleague and former significant other, Caroline Ellison. These materials had gone out to a reporter and were meant to uphold Bankman-Fried’s reputation, prior to the unexpected final of Alameda Research, a crypto hedge finance opened by Bankman-Fried and lead by Ellison to to combing revenue. According to prosecutors, they charged at least $ millions were flighted from consumer records to cover the shortfall of that financing. In any case, Bankman-Fried’s representatives insist that returning Ellison’s writings was meaningless to the tampering said witnesses against him charge they made. Despite Judge Lewis Kaplan recognizing and prosecuting Bankman-Fried’s breach bail of conviction, the disagreement continues to swirl around the movements of Bankman-Fried which are alleged to contest approaching witness and aggravated quarrel the impairment Ellison as accomplishing.
